<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Politics is all the Rage</title>
	<atom:link href="http://richbird.wordpress.com/2008/08/16/politics-is-all-the-rage/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://richbird.wordpress.com/2008/08/16/politics-is-all-the-rage/</link>
	<description>Your blog for all the news on music, film, games, and more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2008 15:58:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://richbird.wordpress.com/2008/08/16/politics-is-all-the-rage/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 16:36:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://richbird.wordpress.com/?p=59#comment-10</guid>
		<description>Music has long been a tool implemented for non-violent protest. Rage Against the Machine has always had the goal of provoking listeners to choose sides on an issue (ambivalence being the proletariat&#039;s crime). 

A presidential election certainly calls for American&#039;s to pick a side, assuming of course the candidates themselves take a clear position. Unfortunately, both McCain and Obama have loosely defined objectives for ending the war, and I can only assume that Rage Against the Machine finds their soft positions inadequate.

Perhaps they can inspire their fans to definitively choose a side on the war and thereby force their representation in government to do the same. This is democracy in its most dynamic (read: idealistic) form.

For further dialogue on music&#039;s ability to impact social norms, check out http://akoma-ntoso.blogspot.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Music has long been a tool implemented for non-violent protest. Rage Against the Machine has always had the goal of provoking listeners to choose sides on an issue (ambivalence being the proletariat&#8217;s crime). </p>
<p>A presidential election certainly calls for American&#8217;s to pick a side, assuming of course the candidates themselves take a clear position. Unfortunately, both McCain and Obama have loosely defined objectives for ending the war, and I can only assume that Rage Against the Machine finds their soft positions inadequate.</p>
<p>Perhaps they can inspire their fans to definitively choose a side on the war and thereby force their representation in government to do the same. This is democracy in its most dynamic (read: idealistic) form.</p>
<p>For further dialogue on music&#8217;s ability to impact social norms, check out <a href="http://akoma-ntoso.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">http://akoma-ntoso.blogspot.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
